Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 08:38:48 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: atr@pobox.com, michaelv@mindbender.serv.net, tom@inna.net, drussell@saturn-tech.com, chuckr@glue.umd.edu, steve@visint.co.uk, dave@persprog.com, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? Message-ID: <199704171438.IAA12807@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199704170213.TAA19390@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> References: <Pine.OSF.3.95.970416121159.2259A-100000@gonzo.wolfenet.com> <199704170213.TAA19390@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I want to see this: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=1m count=200 > > :) > > Results so far: > > P5-133 115MB/s (non-parity EDO, with P5-optimized copyin/out) > P6-200 89MB/s (non-parity EDO) > P6-200 87MB/s (with ECC, non-EDO) > P6-233 89MB/s (with ECC, non-EDO) P5-166 (non-partiy, non-EDO, with P5 optimzied copyin/out standard in 2.2.1) 209715200 bytes transferred in 1.747394 secs (120015980 bytes/sec) Triton I board, probably the same as Satoshis. I may be able to get some P6 numbers, but the boxes are both running NT now. :( Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704171438.IAA12807>