Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 03:08:59 -0800 From: "Loren M. Lang" <lorenl@alzatex.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: FFS vs. UFS vs. UFS2 Message-ID: <20041115110859.GA10030@alzatex.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
FreeBSD's main file system is currently UFS2, but I've also heard
reference to UFS and the Berkeley Fast File System(FFS). Looking
through the kernel source I've found directories for both ufs and ffs,
but not ufs2 (/sys/ufs/{ufs|ffs}/). Also, it seems like Solaris and/or
other commercial unices also used ufs, is this the same ufs used in BSD
and how does this relate to ffs and ufs2?
--=20
I sense much NT in you.
NT leads to Bluescreen.
Bluescreen leads to downtime.
Downtime leads to suffering.
NT is the path to the darkside.
Powerful Unix is.
Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc
Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C
=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041115110859.GA10030>