Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Mar 1998 18:46:47 -0800 (PST)
From:      Jin Guojun (ITG staff) <jin@george.lbl.gov>
To:        grog@lemis.com, jonny@coppe.ufrj.br, mike@smith.net.au
Cc:        hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: TX Chipset and more than 64M Ram
Message-ID:  <199803050246.SAA07277@george.lbl.gov>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg (grog@lemis.com) wrote:
:
:>>   What kind of problem could I expect from FreeBSD if I run a TX
:>> chipset motherboard with 128M RAM ?
:>
:> Your performance will suck.
:
:Your performance will drop instead of increasing.

This is controversial with what you strongly agree at below.

:>>  This chipset can only cache
:>> 64M.  Anything other than performance ?  Is it possible to force
:>> FreeBSD to use the low 64M preferentially ?
:>
:> Take the top 64M out.
:>
:> Seriously, it's going to cost you less to replace the board with one
:> wearing an HX chipset than the time that the TX board will waste you.
:
:The German magazine c't, which I personally greatly respect, did a
:test of a number of motherboards which can cache more than 64 MB in
:their issue 4/98.  The chipsets tested were:
:
???????????????????????
: Intel 430TX	???????
: Ali Aladdin IV+
: VIA Apollo VP2
: SiS 5582
: Intel 430HX
: VIA Apollo VPX
:
:The order is the order of speed in c't's BAPCo benchmark (which,
:unfortunately, is stronly Microsoft-oriented) with 64 MB main memory
:(430TX is the fastest, with a rating of 225, compared to 221 for teh
:Aladdin and the VP2).  With increasing memory, the TX performance
:drops, while the performance of the other chip sets increases.  At 72
:MB, the TX drops below Aladdin and VP2, at 96 MB (!) below the HX, and
:by 128 MB, it's down to 204, compared to 227 for the Aladdin (which by
:this time has left the VP2 behind).
:
:All reports say that the cache limit is particularly hard on Microsoft
:due to its brain-damaged memory allocation; I can't verify this, but
:I'm prepared to believe it.  That would mean that the drop under
:FreeBSD would be less.  I'm currently running a TX board with 96 MB,
:and while I'm trying to replace it, I can't say that "my performance
:sucks".
:

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803050246.SAA07277>