Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2020 21:49:56 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 250499] [tcp] Should we reject the packet with timestamp if no timestamp in SYN and SYN_ACK? Message-ID: <bug-250499-7501-5PgAIXhli6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-250499-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-250499-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D250499 --- Comment #1 from commit-hook@FreeBSD.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: tuexen Date: Mon Nov 9 21:49:42 UTC 2020 New revision: 367530 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/367530 Log: RFC 7323 specifies that: * TCP segments without timestamps should be dropped when support for the timestamp option has been negotiated. * TCP segments with timestamps should be processed normally if support for the timestamp option has not been negotiated. This patch enforces the above. PR: 250499 Reviewed by: gnn, rrs MFC after: 1 week Sponsored by: Netflix, Inc Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D27148 Changes: head/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c head/sys/netinet/tcp_stacks/bbr.c head/sys/netinet/tcp_stacks/rack.c head/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c head/sys/netinet/tcp_timewait.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-250499-7501-5PgAIXhli6>