Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:11:56 +1000 From: Trev <freebsd-doc@sentry.org> To: freebsd-doc <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [Bug 219421] [patch] handbook jail chapter removing ezjail section Message-ID: <b67255cb-143b-302f-67f0-7d6a9aa01529@sentry.org> In-Reply-To: <bug-219421-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-219421-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote on 21/05/2017 03:57: > Bug ID: 219421 > Summary: [patch] handbook jail chapter removing ezjail > Product: Documentation > Version: Latest > Hardware: Any > OS: Any > Status: New > Keywords: patch > Severity: Affects Many People > Priority: --- > Component: Documentation > Assignee: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org > Reporter: qjail1@a1poweruser.com > Keywords: patch > > Created attachment 182757 > --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=182757&action=edit > handbook jail chapter diff file > > In the comments for PR # 218849 people voiced concerns that it is > inappropriate for the handbook to devote a section on how to use a > port. That information belongs in the ports own documentation. I had assumed that this was correct... the Handbook only dealt with "base" and a ports section had inadvertently been included. Until today, when I was looking at the mail section of the Handbook and came across these sections devoted to "ports": https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/SMTP-Auth.html https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mail-agents.html https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mail-fetchmail.html https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mail-procmail.html So, are all these sections to be removed also? Somehow I don't think so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b67255cb-143b-302f-67f0-7d6a9aa01529>