Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:30:12 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some Unix benchmarks for those who are interesed Message-ID: <esmpaj$qa0$2@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan> References: <20070306020826.GA18228@nowhere> <45ECF00D.3070101@samsco.org> <20070306050312.GA2437@nowhere> <008101c75fcc$210c74a0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <esk9vq$uhh$1@sea.gmane.org> <001a01c7601d$5d635ee0$0c00a8c0@Artem> <eskka8$adn$1@sea.gmane.org> <001801c7603a$5339e020$0c00a8c0@Artem> <eskpd1$sm4$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070307105144.1d4a382f@daydream.goid.lan> <esmo7b$lra$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070307112308.7da56ccd@daydream.goid.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: > On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:11:24 +0100 > Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> wrote: > >> Charles Shannon Hendrix wrote: >> >>> BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 4.1-wht.1) >> Off-topic: Who or what is the origin of the "wht" version? One of the >> nice things about unixbench is that it hadn't changed from 1997, but now >> most Linux variants use the -wht version that has completely different >> baselines and results from the "normal" version? > > It's a version created for the website: webhostingtalk.com. > > It was created to have a stable and standard benchmark. Beautiful - they fiddled with the baselines but still managed not to see the obvious problem in execl() call in the execl benchmark for 64-bit platforms. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird/FreeBSD - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF7uiVldnAQVacBcgRAjd6AJ9BVLgDQeBfsi4fqzUv/AfijBmE7wCgy8FK ca8rC/Hyx97aXPXr7e00aUw= =aJj/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?esmpaj$qa0$2>