Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 13:36:55 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: LOR web page Message-ID: <200405031336.55348.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040501203929.GD6481@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0404301733070.11677@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <200404301625.26064.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20040501203929.GD6481@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 01 May 2004 04:39 pm, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Fri, 2004-Apr-30 16:25:26 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > >On Friday 30 April 2004 01:42 pm, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > >> being one of the first persons who had asked for such a page some time > >> back last year I - do not know why but sporadically - put up a web page > >> with the last 6 LORs reported I could find (inluding the FAQ one ;-) > > Thank you very much. > > >Just a couple of notes: the 002 (the sleeping with sigacts on stopevent) > > is fixed. Also, the 004 one is known and is a problem but fixing it is > > somewhat complicated. > > My feeling is that fixed LORs should remain listed, with an annotation > to state that they're fixed. Ideally, it would also have a reference > to the fix but that may be too time-consuming to track down. > > The benefits of this are: > 1) Someone running not-so-CURRENT can see whether upgrading will help. > 2) If someone is seeing 'fixed' LORs after the fix date then either the > fix didn't fix all the scenarios or a new bug has crept in. Sounds like a good idea. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405031336.55348.jhb>