Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 08:26:51 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: isofs/cd9660 -> relocate to fs/isofs/cd9660? Message-ID: <20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <451ADC21.50206@centtech.com> <451AE27F.3010506@samsco.org> <200609271727.29775.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> (from Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:27:29 -0400): > We've actually moved most of the filesystems into sys/fs in the past. Only > cd9660, nfs, and ufs are in the top-level. I'd still say leave nfs and ufs > alone, but sys/isofs/cd9660 -> sys/fs/cd9660 (I wouldn't keep the extra isofs > directory) probably wouldn't be but so painful at this point. I expect a lot of moves when we switch to a VCS where moves are cheap... but on the other hand, maybe this is another bikeshed. Bye, Alexander. -- Vegeterians beware! You are what you eat. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060928082651.b6xp2ayu9wg40wok>