Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:24:48 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@freebsd.org> To: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS client/buffer cache deadlock Message-ID: <20050420142448.GH1157@green.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <20050420140409.GA77731@stack.nl> References: <20050418092752.GB97539@stack.nl> <20050418202213.GC1157@green.homeunix.org> <20050418203321.GA88774@stack.nl> <20050419133227.GA11612@stack.nl> <20050419151800.GE1157@green.homeunix.org> <20050419160258.GA12287@stack.nl> <20050419160900.GB12287@stack.nl> <20050419161616.GF1157@green.homeunix.org> <20050419204723.GG1157@green.homeunix.org> <20050420140409.GA77731@stack.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 04:04:09PM +0200, Marc Olzheim wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 04:47:23PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > This compiles. > > It does and it seems to work. The NFS performance drops considerably > though, from 8/9 MByte/s to 3/4 on sequential reads for instance. > > kern/79208 is fixed by this indeed, in that I get short writes (in case > of my test server at 1802240+ bytes, so './writev 2 foo' fails... Performance drops in what cases? -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050420142448.GH1157>