Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:58:35 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: rgrimes@freebsd.org, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r361238 - head/sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs Message-ID: <b21446b3-fe2c-2b74-214d-c57e613ed1ea@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <202005191534.04JFYlSQ006759@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> References: <202005191534.04JFYlSQ006759@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/19/20 8:34 AM, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > The EISDIR behavior is what your changing, independent of file system(s) > you have done so far. The fact the behavior is now different between > UFS and ZFS is sic, IMHO. Oh please. NFS already fails with ESIDIR and has failed to read() directories for 30 years: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/csrg?view=revision&revision=41905 We haven't had riots in the streets over that. If you actually looked at what ZFS was returning for read(), it was useless. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b21446b3-fe2c-2b74-214d-c57e613ed1ea>