Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:10:48 +0100 (CET)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        prad <prad@towardsfreedom.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors
Message-ID:  <20081215130946.L53356@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20081214230425.68dfd5e7@gom.home>
References:  <4942B6A3.504@gmail.com> <18754.48923.616173.319215@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20081212205614.GB37185@kokopelli.hydra> <31371229120906@webmail12.yandex.ru> <87iqppdlzh.fsf@kobe.laptop> <20081213002037.F5665@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081213092104.GC39031@kokopelli.hydra> <20081213103054.B8893@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081213194302.GA51063@kokopelli.hydra> <20081213122621.001352ad@gom.home> <20081215061228.GE5527@kokopelli.hydra> <20081214230425.68dfd5e7@gom.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> i don't think that has to happen at all.
>
> personally i think self-moderation is best, followed by moderation
> (which i haven't found to be a bad thing).
>
> here the former seems to be dominant because of the quality of people
> on the list, so it is quite sufficient.

this quality gets down. not because lots of smart people get dumber, but 
because lots of new people comes, mostly those who "heard" about FreeBSD 
being better than windows etc..



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081215130946.L53356>