Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:58:14 -0700 From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: "Oldach, Helge" <Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com> Subject: Re: FAST_IPSEC bug fix Message-ID: <B8E1B8D8-9629-11D8-AAEB-000A95AD0668@errno.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.0.20040424142123.07bf3db0@64.7.153.2> References: <D2CFC58E0F8CB443B54BE72201E8916E94CBB2@dehhx005.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com> <44658B20-9610-11D8-AAEB-000A95AD0668@errno.com> <6.0.3.0.0.20040424142123.07bf3db0@64.7.153.2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 24, 2004, at 11:24 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 12:56 PM 24/04/2004, Sam Leffler wrote: >> On Apr 24, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Oldach, Helge wrote: >> >>> Hi list, >>> >>> this is a month-old mail about the lack of a FAST_IPSEC feature >>> compared >>> to legacy IPSEC. Including a working patch. I haven't seen this being >>> committed, or is it? Please also MFC to STABLE. >> >> The fix was not quite right for -current (where it needs to go in >> first). I sent out the attached patch for testing but received no >> feedback. Until I can get it tested and committed to -current it >> won't be MFC'd. > > We dont run -current here, so I dont have anything to test it on. > Also, due to the bugs in the driver with HiFn 7955, we have had to > abandon FAST_IPSEC :( Running FAST IPSEC w/o h/w crypto is still faster than KAME IPsec. See the results in my BSDCon paper. Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B8E1B8D8-9629-11D8-AAEB-000A95AD0668>