Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:34:30 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/imaptools: port removal at Monday April 9th Message-ID: <4F8177C6.2070401@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com> References: <4F809513.9090600@passap.ru> <CACdU%2Bf8XjN_M-oDG-s6futYbXXY5VEnO3WMGMCnivmu8UDR7EQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADLo83_%2BvgSKDCN9i0shyOWjmdiDvbfLdxmU2qs=UKDbac6tnw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMuy=%2Bj2Br0PfbqnfWVakNu%2BJ=tZa%2BmJB0W7wR--CEVAqgzc5g@mail.gmail.com> <20120408012557.GB12126@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
08.04.2012 05:25, Mark Linimon пишет: > portmgr's policy is to honor removal requests, no matter the circumstances. > If someone wants to fork the last free release and host it somewhere, I > would be less concerned in that case. Yes, It's just what I think: As the maintainer of the port I should remove it under the author's request. If someone create a fork then the port may be restored from attick. -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F8177C6.2070401>