Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:21:50 +0100 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slight change of vnode<-->vm object relationship. Message-ID: <36080.1105528910@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:49:56 EST." <1105487395.57137.26.camel@palm.tree.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <1105487395.57137.26.camel@palm.tree.com>, Stephan Uphoff writes: >Do you mean VOP_INACTIVE instead of VOP_CLOSE ? >VOP_CLOSE is called for every close() call to the file - not just the >last close. yes I do in fact, I simplified a little bit in order to make it clearer for non-VOP-wizards what I was talking about. >The NFS server also does not call VOP_OPEN - so this may be another >problem. That is actually sort of a problem, but a different one, so lets leave it alone for now. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?36080.1105528910>