Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:45:14 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <1074530713.53674.9.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <359167705.1074533881@andromede.reaumur.absolight.net> References: <200401191544.i0JFib85052132@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040119163258.GB4722@dragon.nuxi.com> <359167705.1074533881@andromede.reaumur.absolight.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
V po, 19. 01. 2004 v 17:38, Mathieu Arnold píše:
> |> mat 2004/01/19 07:44:37 PST
> |>
> |> FreeBSD ports repository
> |>
> |> Modified files:
> |> mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
> |> Log:
> |> Update to 2.62
> |> Have the least thing possible between bsd.port.pre.mk and post.mk
> |
> | Please back this out. It is hard to read and find the dependencies. The
> | Porter's handbook clearly documents where w/in a port's Makefile
> | {BUILD,RUN}_DEPENDS belong in the Makefile.
>
> Do you really mean that every perl port that does this should be changed ?
> it's the first time someone tells me so.
I don't see any problem with having conditional dependencies specified
in the very bottom of a Makefile ... even, I like it more this way.
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
"Well, she turned me into a newt!" "A newt?" "I got better."
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBADAmZntdYP8FOsoIRAiT8AJsF5/9JAI4m5io6HnLX8owdxHRg7QCgpSps
ER6SyOIFt7Y3EuxttUe/TKI=
=zwvf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1074530713.53674.9.camel>