Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 14:37:36 -0700 From: Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> To: Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml Message-ID: <CAF6rxgmV28JTf2v70YL9ixk-JfsMgSWXkSWbS7k9HHRAdQ8TSw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGMYy3vL48W98bD9Jvmx%2B2pP_wX0hTYxPJgZJ%2B7f91DL1h-BFA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201207081900.q68J08f7088286@repoman.freebsd.org> <CAGMYy3vL48W98bD9Jvmx%2B2pP_wX0hTYxPJgZJ%2B7f91DL1h-BFA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 July 2012 12:27, Xin LI <delphij@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org> wrote: >> eadler 2012-07-08 19:00:08 UTC > I don't think it's right to assign same identifier to different > issues. For 2.8.9 I think it was: In general, I agree. I wasn't able to determine which issue related to each update when writing this one up. > It seems that OpenX does not release any information about the > vulnerability which is a bad practice in my opinion by the way. My thoughts exactly :) -- Eitan Adler Source & Ports committer X11, Bugbusting teams
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgmV28JTf2v70YL9ixk-JfsMgSWXkSWbS7k9HHRAdQ8TSw>