Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:39:18 -0700 From: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> To: "tm4525@aol.com" <tm4525@aol.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious investigations into UNIX and Windows Message-ID: <57d7100004102509396fb77579@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <96.186ca920.2eae82f1@aol.com> References: <96.186ca920.2eae82f1@aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:25:21 EDT, tm4525@aol.com <tm4525@aol.com> wrote: > > > > > In a message dated 10/25/04 11:48:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > nomadlogic@gmail.com writes: > > There's also less documentation, fewer resources, etc. So its more > difficult > > to be proficient in unix than in windows. > > > >what are you talking about "less documentation" for Unix?!? What > >"Unix" are you referring to...Solaris...HPUX..AIX...BSD? I'm sorry to > >bite on this flame bait but i've been tracking your posts for some > >time now and I really don't understand where you get these ideas from? > Let's see. The mailing list is "freebsd-questions". Hmmm. I wonder. > > Perhaps the word "logic" in your domain name needs tweaking? > > OK aside from personal attacks, I'm still confused as to where you derived the fact that "Unix" (which I suppose you do not mean as the generic term for a type of multiuser operating system, but infact BSD which is not technically UNIX) has less documentation than Windows. I can't remember the last time I typed: > man net on anything like that on a win box. Now I would grant that Microsoft *does* have the MSCE mill....now I'm not sure if that would equate them documenting thier products.... -p >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57d7100004102509396fb77579>