Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:25:27 +0200 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Aleksey Perov <algardo@sura.ru>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggested addition to 'date' Message-ID: <86hd0blfbc.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <44E38F2C.8000207@elischer.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Wed, 16 Aug 2006 14:33:32 -0700") References: <44DD4510.5070002@elischer.org> <20060816131824.67a8053b.algardo@sura.ru> <44E38F2C.8000207@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> writes: > I will simply put the unhancement in out own cvs tree, and the > enhancement will be private. I'm still comletely amazed that no-one > but me thinks this is a good idea as it seems absolutly obvious to > me and it doesn't affect date's usual behaviour in the slightest. Obvious to you, perhaps. To me it seems completely illogical. It would make far more sense to add a date option to cat(1), which already has a line-numbering option. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hd0blfbc.fsf>