Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 18:06:33 +1000 From: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au> To: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> Cc: Sung Nae Cho <sucho2@quasar.phys.vt.edu>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bullshit! Mac OS X is not FreeBSD. Get real please. Message-ID: <3B5E7E09.45AF3AD7@quake.com.au> References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107250014240.20007-100000@quasar.phys.vt.edu> <20010725003807.B2319@freeway.dcfinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Chad R. Larson" wrote: > > > I've tried em and Windows 2000 is a totally different beast than any > > previous Windows (2000 is stable as a rock!). > > My Windows 2000 Professional gave me the "blue screen of death" > three times today. Each time in NDIS.SYS, for what it's worth. For what its worth Iv had win2000 pro lock hard several times while trying to just add one of those dfs things to ad... Needless to say this not a very demanding task for the system, and its meant to be one of those "great new features" that makes 2k so much better than NT... I dont call a system that locks hard while trying to do a simple administrative task "stable as a rock"... I call it a pile of crap that wasnt worth the box it came in! Have you ever had FreeBSD lockup while creating a sym link or adding a user? Because thats what this is akin to... 2k might be a nice desktop, but it sure doesnt cut it when it comes to being a server, which is what MS say its meant to be... And remember that when you use it as a desktop its full of all its server crap slowing your system down and eating up memory... But since when is the stable list about windows or os X??? Just wondering how any of this relates to STABLE in anyway... Oh hang on this is yet another troll by that sung guy... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B5E7E09.45AF3AD7>