Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 19:54:20 -0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/rpc.statd file.c Message-ID: <200103210354.f2L3sKh53600@mobile.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <20010320184602.M29888@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> [010320 18:34] wrote: > > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > alfred 2001/03/19 17:36:42 PST > > > > > > Modified files: > > > usr.sbin/rpc.statd file.c > > > Log: > > > Included in the updated version of tirpc's sm_inter.x Sun added the > > > SM_NOTIFY procedure. > > > > > > Remove our hand-coded one as it was causing world breakage for > > > worlds compiled with NOSHARED=yes because the static linker is a > > > bit less forgiving (or not as broken as) our dynamic linker. > > > > Not broken... The symbol namespaces for dynamic linking are a hierarchy, > > unlike in static linking. It's simply different semantics. > > I can forward you the error message you get when you try to link static > if you'd like. :) That isn't what I said. The dynamic linker is not broken. The rpc.statd code was just incompatable with static linking due to different semantics. I was commenting on the "or not as broken as" part. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103210354.f2L3sKh53600>