Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 22:57:16 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Nathan Dorfman <na@rtfm.net> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@icloud.com>, Walter Hop <freebsd@spam.lifeforms.nl>, Pawel Biernacki <pawel.biernacki@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Proposal Message-ID: <86txa2xlub.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <CADgEyUuz1YU7qPkKmydOaGT%2B%2B3tK4LZZU3-1AsK5jssSkQiLYw@mail.gmail.com> (Nathan Dorfman's message of "Wed, 9 Apr 2014 16:39:01 -0400") References: <9eeba1ab-2ab0-4188-82aa-686c5573a5db@me.com> <8D81F198-36A7-47F4-B486-DA059910A6B4@spam.lifeforms.nl> <867g6y1kfe.fsf@nine.des.no> <CADgEyUstkxO1i_B9Qsw=K9qT=nrh9evhv8VekMdNKauOQFN6dg@mail.gmail.com> <86d2gqz2he.fsf@nine.des.no> <CADgEyUuz1YU7qPkKmydOaGT%2B%2B3tK4LZZU3-1AsK5jssSkQiLYw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nathan Dorfman <na@rtfm.net> writes: > Moving on, is it not worth talking about going in and defining every > -DOPENSSL_NO_* flag that exists and doesn't break the base system? On > the simple grounds that there appears to be little to be gained from > this kind of feeping creaturism, and plenty, as it turns out, to be > lost. This is similar in principle to what Peter did with svnlite. Worth considering. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86txa2xlub.fsf>