Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 19:03:31 -0500 From: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: trustedbsd-audit@TrustedBSD.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Audit integration into CVS in progress, some tree disruption Message-ID: <43E14C53.3060400@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <20060201222704.G87763@fledge.watson.org> References: <20060201221213.L87763@fledge.watson.org> <43E134AB.8000600@t-hosting.hu> <20060201222704.G87763@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Kövesdán Gábor wrote: > >> Do you plan to merge it to RELENG_6? If so, when? Maybe for the >> upcoming 6.1? Or only for 6.2 or later? > > It depends a bit how well this shakes out. The code is definitely > still "experimental", in that the set of events audited is not yet > complete. There are three general sorts of weaknesses in the set of > events currently audited: > With all this in mind, it is not yet ruled out that we could ship > initial "experimental" audit support in 6.1-RELEASE. In fact, the > timing is currently such that it will be possible, assuming all goes > well, and allowing for the fact that it really will be an experimental > feature and not production feature in 6.1. We were quite careful to > merge the necessary ABI changes to RELENG_6 before the 6.0 release so > that merging it would be possible without breaking existing 6.x device > drivers. Personally, i would like to see less "experimental" code in 6.1. Perhaps it would be better to wait until everyone feels the code is ready?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E14C53.3060400>