Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 08:59:25 +0000 From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng extra.css Message-ID: <20040712085925.GH68096@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040712.164719.45884840.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> References: <200407111649.i6BGnsqS078577@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040712053516.GD68096@hub.freebsd.org> <20040712.164719.45884840.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 04:47:19PM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > murray> all others in the tree). If we want to go back to left justification > > Yes. I thought that the center justification is needed > for the title and the authorgroup part only. Let me make sure, > well, you mean you think it is also needed for the part of > trademarks and abstract? Well, I added it, so I know that's what it is for. =) It was only intended for the abstract, not the trademarks (and it still met that intention in the Split HTML case). I was experimenting with different ways of rendering the abstract because I don't like the default way it is done. I don't really care one way or the other, but I do think the default way the abstract is displayed could be spruced up somehow with the CSS. - Murray
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040712085925.GH68096>