Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 31 Jul 2000 11:39:01 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Siobhan Patricia Lynch <trish@bsdunix.net>
To:        Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSO.4.21.0007311137050.21752-100000@superconductor.rush.net>
In-Reply-To: <200007311323.XAA29849@cairo.anu.edu.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

funny, the amount fo traffic we do, and it hasn;t gone boom yet

tell me how to reproduce it, and well, if I crash it, then I'll switch,
you'll have to do some convincing first.

like I said, I do some pretty insane traffic through this thing and I
haven;t had *any* problems to date.

-Trish

__

Trish Lynch
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve 		trish@bsdunix.net
Rush Networking				trish@rush.net

On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Darren Reed wrote:

> In some mail from Siobhan Patricia Lynch, sie said:
> > unfortunately, it was put in as a stop gap. you have to remember that
> > certain people were opposed to me doing ANYTHING at first, however I have
> > not had a problem to date. and the traffic flowing through it is quite
> > heavy.
> 
> It occurs to me that perhaps these people should have been listened to
> more closely...
> 
> > noone is going to convince me that ipfw is the wrong thing for the job,
> > maybe not the *best* thing, but that simply means that I would have needed
> > an openbsd disk in an emergency at that particular time and had I had the
> > cd's , well we wouldn;t  be having this discussion on a *freebsd* list,
> > eh?
> 
> Well, had you gone the OpenBSD route you wouldn't have introduced a number
> of bugs which can lead to a system doing filtering on bridged packets going
> "boom".  This is the sort of careless activity that leads to security holes
> being introduced - and what's worse, it could have been avoided.  Maybe the
> post to bugtraq about this should list you personally as the reason to blame
> if you want to claim the responsibility for it (ipfw for bridging) being
> introduced.
> 
> Darren
> 
> p.s. I'm indifferent to what OS you chose, but not so to blantantly buggy
> code being added to the kernel.  Nobody reviewed it either ?  SIGH!
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSO.4.21.0007311137050.21752-100000>