Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 08:42:44 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, security-officer@FreeBSD.org, audit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: audit patches need reviewing/committing Message-ID: <20001215084244.K1873@puck.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20001214222159.B2040@citusc.usc.edu>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 10:21:59PM -0800 References: <20001214191511.Z1873@puck.firepipe.net> <20001214222159.B2040@citusc.usc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 10:21:59PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > You raise a valid point - we need to make sure we don't lose the > new-found momentum on audit, and that the older hands amongst the > audit group give appropriate sign-offs on acceptable patches (or > not). I wish I could be doing this myself right now, but it's > difficult to even keep up with the regular security officer workload > since I'm on vacation. It was certainly _not_ an attack on your (or anyone else's) current situation.. I am aware that some people (especially on the SO team) are particularly starved for time at the moment. However, I'm also sure that at some point something will need to be done. You are the current head of the SO team, and if you know someone who has free time that you trust to review people's audit diffs I'd advise appointing them. :-) > So I'd like to echo Will's call for people to make the effort to > review some of the patches posted here and to give any comments that > occur, positive or negative. Indeed.. what we have are a lot of people interested in auditing but not so many who understand all the implications. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001215084244.K1873>