Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 03:37:53 +0200 From: Nikola =?utf-8?B?UGF2bG92acSH?= <nzp@riseup.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netpbm-10.35.80_2 Message-ID: <20110429013753.GB7154@sputnjik.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20110428152028.GS1733@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20110428104912.1327aa49@seibercom.net> <20110428152028.GS1733@albert.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 08:20:28AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:49:12AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > > The "netpbm-10.35.80_2" port won't build. There is a notation that the > > previous version has to be removed first. I saw something here a few > > days ago regarding that problem. Is the recommended method to do a > > "make deinstall && make reinstall" to get the updated port installed? I > > know that portupgrade chocks on the port if a previous version is > > installed. > > .... > > As (I) documented in ports/156577, what worked for me was: > > pkg_delete -f netpbm-10.26.64_4 > portmaster graphics/netpbm > > I subsequently heard from one person who reported that this did not work > for him. > > For convenince: <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156577>. > Yes, there was an error in the makefile. I had to leave the machine and didn't have time to investigate further, but it was fixed later that day[1][2], and the deinstall/install procedure worked fine after that. [1] <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=156598>; [2] <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/netpbm/Makefile.diff?r1=1.195;r2=1.196;f=h>; -- Hark ye, Clinker, you are a most notorious offender. You stand convicted of sickness, hunger, wretchedness, and want. -- Tobias Smollet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110429013753.GB7154>