Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:41:47 +0300 From: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> To: Zahemszky =?UTF-8?B?R8OhYm9y?= <Gabor@Zahemszky.HU> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-09:02.openssl Message-ID: <20090108234147.f87169ff.stas@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090108205317.4c097662@Picasso.Zahemszky.HU> References: <200901072137.n07LbHwD049781@freefall.freebsd.org> <20090108205317.4c097662@Picasso.Zahemszky.HU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:53:17 +0100 Zahemszky Gábor <Gabor@Zahemszky.HU> mentioned: > Hi! > > Neither the lukemftpd, nor the openssl advisory speaks about > freebsd-update as an upgrade solution. (And I couldn't update with > it.) Why? > What is the problem with freebsd-update? - -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAklmZQsACgkQK/VZk+smlYHNyACfdUBLAVgdti38rQD/RxVPFMP/ ltwAn2UBfdq0oIZpghltCx1WA1RrJD3l =6VDH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- !DSPAM:49666476967001390911012!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090108234147.f87169ff.stas>