Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:41:59 +0000
From:      Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
To:        Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "src-committers@FreeBSD.org" <src-committers@FreeBSD.org>, "dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org" <dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org>, "dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org" <dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: git: 35b7759c05cb - main - cp: Fix build without VM_AND_BUFFER_CACHE_SYNCHRONIZED.
Message-ID:  <YQXPR01MB415043ACC269C3256EAFB959DD799@YQXPR01MB4150.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <CAGudoHEMRkBRT6ew9ROh1p-mmYCbkT%2BewuMdLTdUAiqwg=_3Og@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <202208301453.27UEroGr037461@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <CAGudoHEphH-4pKGf=ta4AWir2Uj9Mg_tUysU1V5ic6z_XVQG4Q@mail.gmail.com> <YQXPR01MB41500177CCDFEECFBE95861EDD799@YQXPR01MB4150.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <837f27fc-97b0-6e71-50c0-12b8799e574d@FreeBSD.org> <CAGudoHEMRkBRT6ew9ROh1p-mmYCbkT%2BewuMdLTdUAiqwg=_3Og@mail.gmail.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/30/22, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 30.08.2022 11:02, Rick Macklem wrote:
>>> Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 8/30/22, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>>>> The branch main has been updated by mav:
>>>>>
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=35b7759c05cbc65c06d87141da79f0f80af0f458
>>>>>
>>>>> commit 35b7759c05cbc65c06d87141da79f0f80af0f458
>>>>> Author:     Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
>>>>> AuthorDate: 2022-08-30 14:51:21 +0000
>>>>> Commit:     Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
>>>>> CommitDate: 2022-08-30 14:51:21 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>      cp: Fix build without VM_AND_BUFFER_CACHE_SYNCHRONIZED.
>>>>>
>>>>>      It allows to not use mmap() for small files, which is not helpful
>>>>>      in case of ZFS.  Should be no functional change.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This should be of no use thanks to copy_file_range
>>> cp does not use copy_file_range(2) for small files, if I recall
>>> correctly.
>>
>> Right.  I tried to look for motivation, but history of this file goes
>> back to 4.4 Lite. :)  I wonder whether copy_file_range(2) for UFS does
>> something clever, like this mmap() to avoid additional memory copy.
It does not at this time. Unless both files are on the same file system and
the file system provides a custom VOP_COPY_FILE_RANGE() { only NFS has
one at this time }, it simply uses vn_rdwr() to do the file system I/O.

A custom VOP_COPY_FILE_RANGE() can be implemented for file systems,
if there is a better way for that file system.

>>  For
>> ZFS though it cause big problem with buffer cache squeezing ARC to
>> absolute minimum.  So if there is agreement to modernize this, I'd
>> completely support it.
>>
>> --
>> Alexander Motin
>>
>
>The way I see it userspace cannot do it any faster.
>
>Especially with the zfs considerations it makes sense to straight up
>copy_file_range if you can and let the kernel figure out what to do in
>a sensible manner. Thought I have no idea if zfs is currently handled
>in such a way. Someone(tm) should look into it.
I've added asomers@, since he did the commit to cp so that
it used copy_file_range(2) and left it doing small files using mmap(2).

rick

--
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YQXPR01MB415043ACC269C3256EAFB959DD799>