Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:57:34 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VFS_VRELE - WILLRELE must die Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.980227183700.5195B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <19980227103412.52813@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Eivind Eklund wrote: > Uhm - what might 'RELE' stand for? My _guess_ is that it is a > shortened form of 'RELEASE', but that's not certain - there are lots > of other possibilities. > > If it is 'release', I'd like VFS_VRELE to be renamed to VFS_VRELEASE. Have a look at vrele() and vput() in vfs_subr.c, calls to these are scattered all over the fs code. VFS_VRELE would be more familiar than VFS_VRELEASE to people working on the fs code. Most of the implementations do the same thing so I'll probably add a vfsop section with vfs_vrele(mp,vp) to phk's vfs_default.c which I stumbled onto today. This can be done anytime later though. If these are accepted then we can start working horizontally across the offending VOPs starting with vop_create. Regards, Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.980227183700.5195B-100000>