Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 14:00:26 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Bohdan Horst <nexus@hoth.amu.edu.pl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (nbench results) Message-ID: <20050524210026.GA28898@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050524205609.GC35326@aristo> References: <20050524193117.GA35326@aristo> <20050524193707.GA11906@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050524201701.GB35326@aristo> <20050524202118.GB28257@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050524205609.GC35326@aristo>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:56:09PM +0200, Bohdan Horst wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 01:21:19PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 10:17:01PM +0200, Bohdan Horst wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:37:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, it might be trustable..but you're still testing gcc 2/gcc 3 as > > pointed out by another poster. If you use the same 4.x binaries on > > both machines it might be better. > > > NUMERIC SORT: 4.11= 499.52 494.31 5.4= 451.26 449.7 5.4O= 491.66 492.53 > STRING SORT: 4.11= 24.13 24.11 5.4= 25.286 25.294 5.4O= 24.206 24.213 > BITFIELD(e+8) 4.11= 1.133 1.1319 5.4= 1.1239 1.1239 5.4O= 1.1358 1.1358 > FP EMULATION 4.11= 18.951 18.755 5.4= 25.044 25.029 5.4O= 18.818 18.818 > FOURIER 4.11= 5361 5356.3 5.4= 5076.3 5076.3 5.4O= 5577 5577 > ASSIGNMENT 4.11= 5.4795 5.4469 5.4= 5.8986 5.8968 5.4O= 5.481 5.4763 > IDEA 4.11= 595.23 592.13 5.4= 660.65 660.65 5.4O= 593.91 593.83 > HUFFMAN 4.11= 332.47 330.91 5.4= 409.06 408.95 5.4O= 333.16 333.16 > NEURAL NET 4.11= 7.0374 6.9882 5.4= 7.2976 7.2955 5.4O= 7.033 7.0201 > LU DECOMP. 4.11= 225.94 226.76 5.4= 211.56 210.84 5.4O= 219.41 220.15 > original: > INTEGER INDEX 4.11= 12.305 12.238 5.4= 13.409 13.400 5.4O= 12.275 12.277 > FLOATING-POINT 4.11= 9.309 9.296 5.4= 9.052 9.041 5.4O= 9.339 9.344 > new: > MEMORY INDEX 4.11= 3.321 3.313 5.4= 3.448 3.448 5.4O= 3.328 3.327 > INTEGER INDEX 4.11= 2.895 2.873 5.4= 3.271 3.268 5.4O= 2.878 2.880 > FLOATING-POINT 4.11= 5.163 5.156 5.4= 5.020 5.014 5.4O= 5.180 5.182 > > (5.4O == 4.11 binary on 5.4R) > > almost identical speed :) Yeah, that's pretty much expected since these are userland benchmarks (but still good to confirm!) Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCk5XqWry0BWjoQKURAiE+AKD0OOLMH6MqAQ5T4lN5m307WTDOzQCg10TZ O0HveLxsmuGwp/LpgU6YO5I= =W9P9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050524210026.GA28898>