Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:41:37 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM rules inside pam.d Message-ID: <86eixnfwr2.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <670f29e20902240717m49f53bfx67166c151c01384b@mail.gmail.com> (Ivan Grover's message of "Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:47:00 %2B0530") References: <670f29e20902240717m49f53bfx67166c151c01384b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Grover <ivangrvr299@gmail.com> writes: > Now, after upgrading PAM modules (pam_unix.so, pam_stack.so..) and > library [...] Upgrading from what to what? Have you tried the standard debugging procedure? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86eixnfwr2.fsf>