Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 10:29:48 -0800 (PST) From: Frank Mayhar <frank@exit.com> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [Fwd: cvs commit: src/sys/modules Makefile src/sys/conf files src/sys/modules/ath_rate_sample Makefile src/sys/i386/conf NOTES] Message-ID: <200503111829.j2BITm9x094682@realtime.exit.com> In-Reply-To: <4231C99C.1010407@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric Anderson wrote:
> Hmm - this was working this morning before I updated, with a -CURRENT as of last week, and I didn't notice anything in /usr/src/UPDATING. So what I should have is:
>
> ath_load="YES"
> ath_hal_load="YES"
> ath_rate_load="YES"
I just have
if_ath_load="YES"
in my /boot/loader.conf. That picks up everything.
> I guess what I missed (and just noticed), is that there are not individual modules for each rate algorithm now, one module (named ath_rate) that is the algorithm of whatever is built.
It has been this way for some time, actually.
> > You want to go to sys/modules/ath_rate_{amrr|onoe|sample} and do a 'make
> > install'.
> I did that already - but why doesn't a 'make installkernel ...' not accomplish that? (forgive my ignorance)
It does. It installs ath_rate.ko for each of amrr, onoe and (now) sample.
Obviously, the last one in wins. You'll have to ask Sam about what shortcoming
of the FreeBSD module system leads to this.
> > Hmm. Is ath_rate_sample linked properly?
> How can I help you determine that? (is readelf -a output what you want?)
Already fixed; read your -current email.
--
Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/
Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503111829.j2BITm9x094682>