Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1998 17:13:56 -0500 (CDT) From: David Kelly <dkelly@mail.HiWAAY.net> To: bright@www.hotjobs.com, dag-erli@ifi.uio.no Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, support@yard.de Subject: Re: Linux vs FreeBSD (performances) Message-ID: <199808202213.RAA30392@mail.HiWAAY.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> recent NFS benchmarks are almost laughable.
>
> time dd if=www2_otherlocal.tar.gz of=/dev/null bs=128k
> 219+1 records in
> 219+1 records out
> 28760021 bytes transferred in 3.411756 secs (8429683 bytes/sec)
> 0.000u 0.443s 0:03.42 12.8% 91+667k 0+17io 0pf+0w
>
> 3.4 seconds (that's freebsd 3.0-current options: nfsv3,intr,tcp,rw,bg)
PeeCee: {1016} time dd if=testfile of=/dev/null bs=128k
219+1 records in
219+1 records out
28760021 bytes transferred in 30.726641 secs (935996 bytes/sec)
0.0u 1.0s 0:30.79 3.2% 71+501k 3+0io 5pf+0w
PeeCee: {1017} uname -a
FreeBSD PeeCee.tbe.com 2.2.6-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 1 10:58:09 CDT 1998 root@PeeCee.tbe.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/PEECEE i386
PeeCee: {1018} df -k .
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
mddc:/usr1 8884684 4787936 4096748 54% /net/mddc/usr1
PeeCee: {1019} rsh mddc uname -a
IRIX mddc 6.3 12161207 IP32
PeeCee: {1020}
Not comparing apples to apples as this is only a 10baseT network. But
I was pleased to see 935996 bytes/sec.
--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net (hm)
======================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808202213.RAA30392>