Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 15:48:13 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/18312: FreeBSD System Recovery -- mt not statically linked Message-ID: <61326.957793693@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 May 2000 11:16:29 MST." <200005051816.LAA80655@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 05 May 2000 11:16:29 MST, Matthew Dillon wrote: > There's not much point statically linking mt if it's sitting in > /usr/bin. On the face of it it does seem a good candidate to move > to /bin. Given that having things move around in the base system carries with it varying degrees of pain, can you guys just explain why this is actually necessary? Didn't someone point out a way to use restore in the absence of mt? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?61326.957793693>