Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 07:58:58 +0800 From: Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> Cc: questions <questions@FreeBSD.org>, Eduardo Morras <emorrasg@yahoo.es> Subject: Re: Motorola SB5101u cable modem Message-ID: <52AF93C2.2090801@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <20131216202007.63487854@X220.alogt.com> References: <52AD1C2C.9060901@a1poweruser.com> <20131215120904.bb12e950e8e6d0f28d371caa@yahoo.es> <52AEE796.2060601@a1poweruser.com> <20131216202007.63487854@X220.alogt.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:44:22 +0800 > Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote: > >> Eduardo Morras wrote: >>> On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 11:04:12 +0800 >>> Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> wrote: >>> >> Sorry my bad, I checked and thats 4 mbps down and 2 mbps up that I am >> paying for. > > then your modem is not the bottleneck but the connection is. > >> My PC has "N" mode nic and I get 130 mbps wifi connection. >> My www.speedtest.net test is 1.24 mbps down and .82 mbps up between > > It is normal that the nominal speed is hardly reached. > > Erich > I don't understand this statement, "then your modem is not the bottleneck but the connection is". Please elaborate in greater detail, what connection are you referring to?home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?52AF93C2.2090801>