Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:22:47 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r216473 - head/sbin/geom/class/eli Message-ID: <201012161422.48209.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1012161902450.39096@fledge.watson.org> References: <201012160036.oBG0aAEh003539@svn.freebsd.org> <20101216175536.GA52462@dragon.NUXI.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1012161902450.39096@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, December 16, 2010 2:04:08 pm Robert Watson wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, David O'Brien wrote: > > >>> Log: > >>> Bump WARNS to 6. > >>> > >>> Modified: > >>> head/sbin/geom/class/eli/Makefile > >> > >> FYI, this broke the tinderbox on arm, ia64, mips, and sparc64. > > > > Errr. Reverted. I built it on the architectures I had access to... > > For WARNS-related changes, I generally use "make universe" to test across > architectures. This builds all of our architectures world + all available > kernels, and seems the most effective way to avoid the above situations. (I've > fallen into exactly the same trap...) > > The one thing to be cautious about is that make universe won't fail if an > individual build fails, so you need to check the logs to make sure everything > actually succeeded. Which is why I prefer 'make tinderbox' since it tells you what fails. :) -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201012161422.48209.jhb>