Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 18:47:20 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> To: Tijl Coosemans <tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Subject: Re: newfs_msdos and DVD-RAM Message-ID: <4BB76308.6010309@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB75E54.4080405@icyb.net.ua> References: <3a142e751003190508x6a06868ene2e8fd9ddd977f66@mail.gmail.com> <4BB644CA.4000807@freebsd.org> <4BB64615.9060601@freebsd.org> <201004031707.34650.tijl@coosemans.org> <4BB75E54.4080405@icyb.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 03/04/2010 18:27 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 03/04/2010 18:07 Tijl Coosemans said the following: >> I'm not sure the second paragraph is worth supporting, but the first >> seems to say that 32k limit you have in your patch only applies to >> disks with 512 byte sectors. For disks with larger sectors it would >> be proportionally larger. > > Last sentence is your own conclusion I guess? > Please read this whole thread to see why it doesn't work that way in practice. > At least for present FreeBSD. OTOH, perhaps you are right and we should consider either bumping MAXBSIZE or retiring it. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BB76308.6010309>