Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:04:57 +0200 From: Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com> To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mounting fdescfs in a nested/hierarchical jail? Message-ID: <3D042FC9-7CD9-4842-8D18-8354F9E1BB80@verweg.com> In-Reply-To: <53F55F7E.4010309@gritton.org> References: <3CB0C5BC-3864-418E-A59F-467D39B7E1EA@verweg.com> <53F55F7E.4010309@gritton.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi Jamie, others, On 21 Aug 2014, at 4:54, James Gritton <jamie@gritton.org> wrote: > On 8/18/2014 6:26 AM, Ruben van Staveren wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> I have a FreeBSD 10 zfs based ezjail setup. In one of the jails I am using ezjail again to set up a nested jail. My goal is to eventually have my jails use these nested jails as containers for certain services. >> >> However, I am not able to mount a nested fdescfs. When I leave out fdesc, the nested jail starts up just fine. >> >> There is no allow.mount.fdescfs. Do we need one? >> >> Cheers, >> Ruben > > That's probably the answer. It seems a little inelegant to have this proliferation of pesudo-fs type allowances, but it's the direction we've gone. Ok, I’ve written a little patch for that. Seems to work on r268794 http://pastebin.com/5t9zEzkV I am not sure about the consequences of having this permission. Best Regards, Ruben [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iEYEARECAAYFAlP2NMkACgkQZ88+mcQxRw0kegCfYDARKjfr4VslsFo2tAA2Ri6g SogAnRTCPTE9T5QrJTar2PkSp2YYR5iG =UL84 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D042FC9-7CD9-4842-8D18-8354F9E1BB80>