Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:31:51 +0400 From: Kamigishi Rei <spambox@haruhiism.net> To: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Goran Lowkrantz <glz@hidden-powers.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> Subject: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch Message-ID: <4A487BF7.8060103@haruhiism.net> In-Reply-To: <4A48798A.5070604@FreeBSD.org> References: <1246206181.00132972.1246192801@10.7.7.3> <1246206186.00132982.1246194002@10.7.7.3> <1246209783.00133001.1246197001@10.7.7.3> <1246260183.00133237.1246247402@10.7.7.3> <4A48798A.5070604@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Motin wrote: >> Kernel builds fine for me after "sed >> 's/AHCI_DMA_ENTRIES/AHCI_SG_ENTRIES/' /usr/src/sys/dev/ahci/ahci.c" >> (only one occurrence of that macro, aside from the .h file, anyway). > You are right. Thank you. Committed to P4. On a side note: the two secondary patches mentioned in the discussion (camcontrol and the other one) do not apply cleanly to r195137, even though the files' contents match. I had to edit the files manually, however, kernel still panics in xpt during boot right after the AHCI bus poll. I didn't remove atapicam from the kernel configuration, because according to your post with that patch earlier the patch should have fixed that behaviour. -- Kamigishi Rei KREI-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A487BF7.8060103>