Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 11:22:05 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <dyson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: rkw@dataplex.net (Richard Wackerbarth) Cc: grog@lemis.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More breakage in -current as a result of header frobbing. Message-ID: <199802211622.LAA00712@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <l03130305b11461699b54@[208.2.87.4]> from Richard Wackerbarth at "Feb 21, 98 05:00:24 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Richard Wackerbarth said: > > > >The problem with both of these extremes... > > >You could say "John should test his changes better before commiting > >them". But that's not always possible. The bugs don't break things > >for him. -CURRENT's there exactly for that. > > Here, I disagree. "Jane" may not be able to test ALL cases. However, > she SHOULD have already tested at least one. > One reason that we have been making progress (differently) is that this "John" now has a viable NFS network (albiet small one.) Now there are better facilities. (Not that I fix all bugs, but I seem to create my share :-)). -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802211622.LAA00712>