Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:18:14 -0600 From: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org> Cc: gldisater@gldis.ca Subject: Re: eclipse3 RC2 port Message-ID: <20040615171814.GA22125@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20040616014104.3945bb4e.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <40CD30FB.7050905@gldis.ca> <20040615215046.2ad687f7.nork@FreeBSD.org> <40CF16D3.1030708@noc.ntua.gr> <20040615154120.GA21489@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20040616011329.4ec549d0.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20040615163345.GA21902@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20040616014104.3945bb4e.nork@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 01:41:04AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:33:45 -0600 > Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> wrote: > > > # make deinstall > > > # find /usr -newer timestamp > > > /usr/local/eclipse3 > > Since you're just updating the eclipse port, we may as well keep the > > installed files in /usr/local/eclipse don't you think? > > I think so. I'll change $PREFIX/eclipse3 to $PREFIX/eclipse. Thanks. > Ah, how about eclipse's plugins problem? I don't know what the problems are so I can't comment :(. > May I commit to java/eclipse-devel without repocopy? And > if eclipse3 will be released, then java/eclipse will be > updated and java/eclipse-devel will be removed. Do you think? Usually a repo copy is in order for a -devel port. I suggest at this point we should: 1. Repo-copy eclipse to eclipse-devel. 2. Commit the 3.0RC2 port to eclipse-devel. 3. Figure out what to do with the eclipse sub ports (e.g. eclipse-gef) when we update eclipse to 3.0 and figure out whatever the plugin problems are. Sorry to be making more work :(. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040615171814.GA22125>