Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:49:08 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMP and IP_PREEMPTION Message-ID: <20060307014908.GA57241@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200603061555.18613.joao@matik.com.br> References: <200603061349.32133.joao@matik.com.br> <200603061238.51592.jhb@freebsd.org> <200603061555.18613.joao@matik.com.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 03:55:18PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > On Monday 06 March 2006 14:38, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday 06 March 2006 11:49, JoaoBR wrote: > > > > > > I experience sudden reboot, no panic, no message at all on SMP systems > > > (releng_6 up-to-date) when the kernel is compiled with > > > > > > > > > I am not so sure but appearently the problem is less with ULE and see= ms > > > to disappear with ULE and without IPI_PREEMPTION and the system runs = up > > > to almost 4Gb normally. > > > >=20 > > > > I'm not aware of the problem, but I don't think IPI_PREEMPTION has been > > widely tested yet. >=20 > ok, do you think that wrong function could cause a silent reboot, not eve= n=20 > "crash" in last output? Yes. Kris --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEDOaUWry0BWjoQKURAiK9AKDiMIaPJGribCMGjasqjRSEIoYuOgCeNR1D 2UOSrvIkqrBGgjrlNDhYMuY= =WSoC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060307014908.GA57241>