Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:09:55 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile README Message-ID: <20060622170955.GY95135@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <200606201516.39121.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200606070333.k573XmRc067920@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060607194300.7565e832.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20060620185321.GA43367@dragon.NUXI.org> <200606201516.39121.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> [060620 13:31] wrote: > On Tuesday 20 June 2006 14:53, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 07:43:00PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > Personally, I was debating on just removing most of the > > > world target with just a message: > > > > > > "The world target has been replaced with the buildworld target." > > > > No! > > > > 'make world' is still my normal building process. Why force > > "make buildworld && make installworld"?? > > > > I don't care how undocumented it is, or obfusacted > > 'HISTORICAL_MAKE_WORLD' is; but please leave them alone! > > > > thanks for your attention. > > You can already get that via 'make DESTDIR=/ world' you know. :) And that's > shorter to type. I think I'm missing something. Is the only difference between "make world" and: "make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld" That make world has the order of installs flipped? -- - Alfred Perlstein - coder / sysadmin / FreeBSD Hacker / All that jazz -
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060622170955.GY95135>