Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Jun 2011 20:31:24 +0400
From:      Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Eir Nym <eirnym@gmail.com>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, will@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Exactly that commit (was Re: Latest -current 100% hang at the late boot stage)
Message-ID:  <20110623163124.GB47670@vniz.net>
In-Reply-To: <20110622200919.GA72504@nargothrond.kdm.org>
References:  <20110620001912.GA60252@vniz.net> <4DFEAD4F.1040603@FreeBSD.org> <20110620070222.GA74009@vniz.net> <20110620080146.GF48734@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20110620114656.GA83524@vniz.net> <20110621161719.GA16166@nargothrond.kdm.org> <20110621204934.GB9877@vniz.net> <20110622035404.GA38834@nargothrond.kdm.org> <20110622041325.GA13754@vniz.net> <20110622200919.GA72504@nargothrond.kdm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:09:19PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> Well, after looking at the code a little more, it looks like the "lock"
> that is being held is the periph lock, which is really just a flag.
> So 'show lock' wouldn't show anything relevant.  Here's cam_periph_hold():

With recent r223475 situation returned to what you describe (and still no 
cd0 in probe). As tracing 100008 show, it was cdopen() who calls 
cam_periph_hold() and sleeps there forever.
Tracing 100014 as you suggest shows almost nothing: only fork_trampoline() 
is there.

-- 
http://ache.vniz.net/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110623163124.GB47670>