Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:04:45 +0100 From: Rafal Jaworowski <raj@semihalf.com> To: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 171338 for review Message-ID: <901E1717-96CA-4067-928D-06DA5B5D1190@semihalf.com> In-Reply-To: <4B17EEA7.5040502@freebsd.org> References: <200912031658.nB3Gw60w063997@repoman.freebsd.org> <4B17EEA7.5040502@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2009-12-03, at 18:00, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > Since this is the same as the OFW interface, or is supposed to be, would it make sense to make this be MI in /sys/dev/ofw, attaching with a low priority to any device with a phandle and OF children? The end goal is something like this, yes -- I want to get it initially working with FDT and in the next round we can optimize/merge it into something generic that suits all OF cases. If you have any particular comments or insight let me know, comments are greatly welcome. Rafalhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?901E1717-96CA-4067-928D-06DA5B5D1190>