Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:22:58 -0700 From: Jason Helfman <jgh@FreeBSD.org> To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [RFC] New Port: Eclipse Java Compiler, java/eclipse-ecj Message-ID: <20120320162258.GN46825@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> In-Reply-To: <201203191945.50219.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120318180225.GA51618@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <201203191900.42677.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20120319230818.GJ46825@dormouse.experts-exchange.com> <201203191945.50219.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:45:45PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim thus spake: >On Monday 19 March 2012 07:08 pm, Jason Helfman wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:00:39PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim thus spake: >> >Hmm... It doesn't seem right. >> > >> >% cat /usr/local/bin/ecj.sh >> >#!/bin/sh >> > >> >/usr/local/openjdk6/bin/javac -classpath >> > /usr/local/share/java/classes/ecj.jar $1 % /usr/local/bin/ecj.sh >> > -version >> >javac 1.6.0_30 >> >% /usr/local/openjdk6/bin/javac -version >> >javac 1.6.0_30 >> > >> >Please note it isn't coming from ecj.jar. >> >> That is grabbing the version of javac based on the shell script. > >Yes, that's exactly my point. :-) > >> I'm not certain if you can get a vesion of the jar with an >> argument, or if that argument is even valid. > >Of course, it is valid: > >% fetch >http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.7.2-201202080800/ecj-3.7.2.jar >ecj-3.7.2.jar 100% of 1708 kB 1851 >kBps >% /usr/local/openjdk6/bin/java -jar ecj-3.7.2.jar -version >Eclipse Compiler for Java(TM) 0.B83_R37x, 3.7.2, Copyright IBM Corp >2000, 2011. All rights reserved. From the bug I had opened, it was indicated that you can run this to get the same result: [jhelfman@dormouse.experts-exchange /usr/local/share/java/classes]$ java -cp ecj-3.7.2.jar org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.Main -version Eclipse Compiler for Java(TM) 0.B83_R37x, 3.7.2, Copyright IBM Corp 2000, 2011. All rights reserved. Here is a bit from the log of the bug: --- Comment #2 from Satyam Kandula <satyam.kandula@in.ibm.com> 2012-03-20 11:48:50 EDT --- The Manifest.Mf is not including the main class! I will see what could be done here. Otherwise, you could try out %java -cp ecj.jar org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch.Main -version I'll see if I can tune the shell script to output the same. -jgh -- Jason Helfman | FreeBSD Committer jgh@FreeBSD.org | http://people.freebsd.org/~jgh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120320162258.GN46825>