Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:22:52 -0600 From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@mac.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh Message-ID: <45D3EC00-1EEE-11D8-B368-000A95AFBEB4@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20031124.190904.127666948.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20031125012208.GD46761@dan.emsphone.com> <200311251214.23290.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031124.190904.127666948.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Nov 24, 2003, at 8:09 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> > Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes: > : I'll bet a larger percentage of our users build ports than need nss > or > : ldap. > > I'll bet a larger percentage of the people are ignoring this thread > than reading it since it has been so devoid of concrete numbers. > Yep :). I feel like saying "set the default to static and make the dynamic bins the option" so the people who can't be bothered to compile their own system even though everyone I know does this for tuning purposes anyway can stop whining. But I won't say that. Dave > Warner > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45D3EC00-1EEE-11D8-B368-000A95AFBEB4>