Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:58:04 -0500 From: "Larry Rosenman" <ler@lerctr.org> To: "Doug Barton" <Doug@gorean.org>, "Andy" <deimos@lewman.com> Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: FreeBSD 3.5 now available . . . . . Message-ID: <NCBBKBDOOHHEJCJHLLPAIEAGHDAA.ler@lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006291247410.9243-100000@dt052n3e.san.rr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
We have found in our ISP environment that the 4.x IP stack is MUCH more
stable for heavy network stuff.
As Doug says, if you haven't reported a bug, you can't expect it to
be fixed.
Larry Rosenman
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
[mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Doug Barton
Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 2:48 PM
To: Andy
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.5 now available . . . . .
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Andy wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I don't know what you're talking about "merging into future 4.x builds".
> > 4.x is already much more stable than 3.x ever was..the bug-fixing has
> > already taken place during the development of the 4.0 branch.
>
> Not to start a massive flamewar here, but in my personal
> experience with multiple FreeBSD boxes in a live environment, I've found
> that 3.x is much more stable than the 4.x servers. I've gone so far as to
> revert the 4.x server back to 3.x. I'm going to revisit the issue when it
> becomes 4.1.
It's a pretty safe bet that your problems won't have been fixed if
you didn't tell anyone about them.
Doug
--
"Live free or die"
- State motto of my ancestral homeland, New Hampshire
Do YOU Yahoo!?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NCBBKBDOOHHEJCJHLLPAIEAGHDAA.ler>