Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 00:42:36 +0100 From: Zenny <garbytrash@gmail.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: Joe Nosay <superbisquit@gmail.com>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.0-RC3 Now Available Message-ID: <CACuV5sCjjsjFK9AjJ7saRPpDktwxf1rd6a-M2FKXXYf-EaBy2w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131226212158.GD13109@glenbarber.us> References: <20131226162521.GK2009@glenbarber.us> <CA%2BWntOt26JXT3Bh8ccSM-fQ726c2Hy3F06n2iDbu3pLBXjn-AA@mail.gmail.com> <20131226212158.GD13109@glenbarber.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Much awaited release, thanks!. However, does the freebsd-update from the earlier version bork in case of ZFS on Root? Or is there a safe way to upgrade without borking. I had a very bad experience when I upgraded from FreeBSD-10B3 to RC1. Thanks! On 12/26/13, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 04:17:27PM -0500, Joe Nosay wrote: >> I take it that building world and kernel from source should present no >> problems, right? >> Is the latest CLang at 3.5 being used or will I need to "hack" the >> Makefile >> in /usr/ports/lang to build it? > > Both world and kernel are built with clang by default. > > Glen > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACuV5sCjjsjFK9AjJ7saRPpDktwxf1rd6a-M2FKXXYf-EaBy2w>