Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 13:31:42 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: obrien@NUXI.com, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc amd.map Message-ID: <199902142131.NAA08466@apollo.backplane.com> References: <11012.919026904@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:Yeah, I don't trust nfs v3.
:
:> > Modified files:
:> > etc amd.map
:> > Log:
:> > Use more sensible defaults.
:>
:> Any reason not to use what freefall uses as our default?
:>
:> freefall: opts:=rw,grpid,resvport,vers=3,proto=udp,nosuid,nodev,intr
:> default: opts:=rw,grpid,resvport,vers=2,proto=udp,nosuid,nodev
:>
:> --
:> -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)
I only trust NFS V3 for read-only mounts myself. The only R+W NFS V3
mounts I use are on my test boxes. If I were pushed to it, I might use
NFS for lightly-used R+W mounts.
Generally speaking, I don't trust NFS at all in a heavy-use production
environment and so don't use it in a heavy-use production environment.
Of course, this could well be due to getting badly scarred by NFS 3 years
ago under 2.0.something. It has gotten a lot more reliable since then.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902142131.NAA08466>